Radiation
therapy now has a lower risk of fatal heart damage to
women with breast cancer than it did for women treated
in the past. The cardiac harm, however, does not show
up until ten or more years after treatment, so it remains
unclear whether this adverse effect has been completely
eliminated by modern improvements in radiation techniques.
These findings were published last month in the JNCI (Journal
of the National Cancer Institute, 3/16/05).
As
of 2002, about 42% of American women newly diagnosed with
breast cancer had the cancerous breast tumor surgically
removed (lumpectomy) followed by six weeks of radiation
therapy. This has been a valid choice ever since 1985
when a major nationwide clinical trial found that mastectomy
(breast removal), lumpectomy plus radiation therapy, and
lumpectomy alone all had the same survival rate. Lumpectomy
alone, however, was—and still is—rarely offered to women.
This is because the same large clinical trial found, in
1993, that the radiation therapy decreased the rate of
breast cancer recurrence, though it did not reduce the
death rate. Worse, as women treated with radiation were
followed beyond ten years, they showed a higher
XXXdeath rate then the women whose breasts were not irradiated.
Obviously,
this was not expected. Researchers began to speculate
that the anticipated decrease in breast cancer mortality
was being offset by an increase in treatment-related deaths.
By the early 1990s, researchers knew that there were more
cardiac deaths among breast cancer patients given radiation
therapy than those whose breasts had not been irradiated.
A 1994 analysis showed a 62% increase in heart-related
deaths among women treated with radiation. Researchers
also knew that women with left-sided breast cancer had
higher rates of radiation exposure and higher rates of
cardiovascular mortality.
To
determine whether the multiple improvements in breast
radiation techniques had overcome this hazard, a Texas
research team assessed the data from 12 cancer registries
around the country. Altogether the registries included
27,283 women with early-stage breast cancer who had been
treated with radiation therapy between 1973 and 2000.
(Radiation therapy after a mastectomy was the standard
breast cancer treatment until the mid-1970s; and it continues
to be used in certain circumstances.) Half of the women
had left-sided breast cancer, and half had right-sided
breast cancer. These registries are broadly representative
of the way breast cancer patients are treated across the
country.
The
researchers, led by Sharon H. Giordano, MD, MPH, University
of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston , found
that the risk of death from heart disease decreased over
time. For the women diagnosed between 1973 and 1979, the
heart disease mortality rate at 15 years was 13% for those
with left-sided breast cancer and 10% for those with right-sided
breast cancer. For the women diagnosed in the late 1980s,
it was nearly 6% and nearly 5%.
Dr.
Giordano and colleagues concluded that, due to advances
in radiation techniques, the risk of cardiac death associated
with radiation after breast cancer “has substantially
decreased over time.” Given that radiation-induced heart
damage takes many years to develop, the researchers added
this caution. “Whether the risk of ischemic heart disease
mortality resulting from radiotherapy has been entirely
eliminated cannot be determined definitely from this study.
Continued follow-up of the women diagnosed and treated
in the late 1980s will be necessary to answer this question.”
Where
does this leave the woman diagnosed today? If radiation
therapy doesn't prolong life, wouldn't it be safer to
forego this treatment, just have a lumpectomy, and take
the small risk of recurrence? “Not quite true,” answered
Jack Cuzick, PhD, author of the editorial that accompanied
the study. In an e-mail interview, Dr. Cuzick explained,
“Recent trials are showing a reduction in breast cancer
deaths [in women given radiation therapy], and little
effect on other causes of death, so for women at high
risk of recurrence and breast cancer death, for example,
those with node-positive breast cancer, radiotherapy is
a pretty good option.” But, Dr. Cuzick cautioned that
there is still uncertainty about the value of radiation
therapy for women whose breast cancer death risk is low,
for example, those with tumors under 1 cm or ductal carcinoma
in situ.
--
Maryann
Napoli, Center for Medical Consumers ©, May 2005.